Susan Atkins, one of the members of the Charles Manson “family,” convicted for the 1969 murders of actress Sharon Tate and four others, has been denied a compassionate release from prison. She was originally sentenced to death but that sentence was changed to life in prison in 1972 when the death penalty was ruled unconstitutional in California. She is the longest-serving female inmate in California—in prison since 1971 and denied parole 11 times. Atkins is now terminally ill. To me, life in prison means life in prison. I’m sorry if that seems cold-hearted, but Atkins had no mercy for Tate, her unborn baby, or the others who were brutally killed on August 9, 1969.
Excerpted from cnn.com…
According to historical accounts of the murder, Atkins stabbed Tate, who was eight months pregnant, and scrawled the word “pig” in blood on the door of the home the actress shared with director Roman Polanski.By her own admission, Atkins held Tate down and rejected her pleas for mercy, stabbing the pregnant woman 16 times.
Atkins’ request roused long-dormant memories of the two-day killing spree that terrorized Los Angeles and left seven people dead. It polarized those who were involved in the case — and even those who weren’t — over whether she should die behind bars.
Atkins told a 1993 parole board that Tate pleaded for her unborn child’s life as she held her down.
“She asked me to let her baby live,” Atkins said. “… I told her I didn’t have any mercy on her.”
…Vincent Bugliosi, who prosecuted Atkins and other members of the Manson Family, said he supported her release, if only to save the state money. Through Monday, the cost for Atkins’ medical care since she was hospitalized March 18 totaled more than $1.15 million, and the costs for guarding her hospital room are more than $308,000, said California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation spokeswoman Terry Thornton.
Terminally ill inmates rarely are allowed compassionate release, records show. In 2007, 60 such requests were made to the department, Thornton has said. Ten were approved.
I was 10-years-old when this happened and I remember being afraid when I read the story in the newspaper—even though I didn’t live in L.A. Years later when I was an adult, I read the book, Helter Skelter by Vincent Bugliosi and Curt Gentry, the story still scared the hell outta me. The cold way that Susan Aktins described the killings is just unbelievable. I understand that releasing her now will save the state of California some money, but life in prison means life in prison.





I think the most cost effective way to deal with Ms. Atkins and save California some time & money is to just stone her. People should offer the same compassion as they do Charles Manson.
By: timvalentine on Wednesday, July 16, 2008
at 10:20 am
I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you down the road!
By: Alex on Tuesday, August 12, 2008
at 7:41 am
Thanks Alex.
By: embrownny on Tuesday, August 12, 2008
at 10:16 am
Life is life. she should be put on hospice care. why are you paying her hospital bills? Even if you let her out she will get state assistance and you will end up paying her medical.
By: debra on Saturday, August 16, 2008
at 8:37 pm
I think this is a very complicated situation,if she wouldn’t have been in this position I would have never wanted her to get out of prison.But she already is out of prison now,she is at the hospital and there is no way she will get out of there.So this thing about getting parole, it’s just a piece of paper,which in this case would only mean that if parole hadn’t been denied, the state no longer would have needed to pay the medical bills.
I think they denied parole more to send a message out to the other family members,Patricia Krenwinkel,Leslie Van Houten, Charles Tex Watson and Charles Manson, to show them that even when you are dying of cancer,there is no way they will ever be paroled
By: audrey on Monday, December 8, 2008
at 10:32 am